“Educational Data Mining” (EDM) or “Learning Analytics and Knowledge” (LAK) is the area of scientific inquiry centered around the development of methods for making discoveries within educational sets and using those methods to better understand students, teaching, and school administration (R. Baker & Yacef, 2009; Romero & Ventura, 2010a; R. Baker & Siemens, in press)

Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House, 78(5), 218–223.

Baete, G. S., & Hochbein, C. (2014). Project Proficiency: A quasi-experimental assessment of high school reform in an urban district. Journal of Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220671.2013.823371#.U5G0bvld W7o.

Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223–235.

Bourn, Rebecca & Willenbring, Jeb. (2019). Expected value of the one dimensional Earth Mover's Distance. Retrieved from https://msp.org/astat/2020/11-1/astat-v11-n1-p04-s.pdf

Bowers, A. J. (2009). Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just academic knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 609–629.

Brennan, R. T., Kim, T., Wenz-Gross, M., & Sipperstein, G. N. (2001). The relative equitability of high-stakes testing versus teacher assigned grades: An analysis of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System. Harvard Education Review, 71(2), 173–216.

Brookhart, S. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35–36. Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Education Measurement, 30(2), 123–142.

Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4) 279–301.

Burks, J. C. & Hochbein, C. (2013). The students in front of us: Reform for the current generation of high school urban high school students. Urban Education. Retrieved from http://uex.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/10/22/0042085913507060.abstract.

Cizek, G.J., Fitzgerald, S. M. & Rachor, R. E. (1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159–179.

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Conley, D. T. (2000, April). Who is proficient: The relationship between proficiency scores and grades. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Cross, C. H., & Frary, R. B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(1), 53–72.

Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990 (2nd ed). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Downey, D. B., von Hippel, P. T., & Hughes, M. (2008). Are “failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 242–270.

Duke, D. L. (1995). The school that refused to die. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Grant, G. (2009). Hope and despair in the American city: Why there are no bad schools in Raleigh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Guarino, C., Reckase, M. D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? (Discussion Paper Series, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, No. 6602). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Guskey, T. R. (2007). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions of various indicators of student learning. Educational Measures: Issues and Practice, 26(1), 19–27.

Guskey, T. R. (2009). Practical solutions for serious problems in standards based grading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Haptonstall, K. (2010). An analysis of the correlation between standards-based, non-standards-based grading systems and achievement as measured by the Colorado student assessment program (CSAP) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.

Harwell, M., & LeBeau, B. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as a SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 120–131.

Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Hiss, W. C., & Franks, V. W. (2014). Defining promise: Optional standardized testing policies in American college and university admissions. Arlington, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.

Hochbein, C., Mitchell, A., & Pollio, M. (2013). The influence of AYP as an indicator of persistently low-achieving schools. NASSP Bulletin, 97(3), 270–289.

Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives, and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 761–796.

Jefferson County Public Schools (2011a). Project proficiency guide. Unpublished manuscript.

Jefferson County Public Schools (2011b). Student progression, promotion, and grading. Louisville, KY: Author.

Kentucky Department of Education. (2010). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) interpretive guide 2010. Retrieved from http://www.education.ky.gov/nr/rdonlyres/0a2e4cd2-7b79-476ca16a-33415da5e2fe/0/2010_nclb_interpretive_guide.pdf Labaree, D. F. (2012). Someone has to fail: The zero-sum game of public schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kretschmann, Jan (2020), "Earth Mover's Distance Between Grade Distribution Data with Fixed Mean" . Theses and Dissertations. 2542.

Lekholm, A. K., & Cliffordson, C. (2008). Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school levels: Effects of gender and family background. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(2), 181–199.

Marzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment & standards-based grading. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.

McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teacher’s classroom and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 20(1), 20–32.

McMillan, J. H., & Nash, S. (2000, April). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practice and decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.

Moore, K. A. (2014). Making the grade: Assessing the evidence for integrated student supports. Bethesda, MD: Child Trends. National Collegiate Athletic Association (n.d.). NCAA Eligibility Center quick reference guide. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association. No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2001).

Pollio, M., & Hochbein, C. (2015). The Association between Standards-Based Grading and Standardized Test Scores as an Element of a High School Reform Model. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511701106

Ogbu, J. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pele, Ofir & Werman, Micheal (2008). Retrieved from https://pypi.org/project/pyemd/ A linear time histogram metric for improved SIFT matching. Computer Vision - ECCV 2008, Marseille, France, pp. 495-508.

Persistently Low-Achieving School and School Intervention Defined. Kentucky Revised Statutes 160.346 (2010).

Podgursky, M. J., & Springer, M. G. (2007). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–949.

Ramdas, Aaditya, Nicolás G. Trillos, and Marco Cuturi (2017). On Wasserstein Two-Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Tests. Entropy 19, no. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19020047

Reback, R. (2008). Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1394–1425.

Reese, W. J. (2005). America’s public schools: From the common school to “No Child Left Behind.” Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

Rosenbaum, J. E. (1997). College-for-all: Do students understand what college demands? Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 55–80.

Sanders, M. G. (2012). Achieving scale at the district level: A longitudinal multiple case study of a partnership reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 154–186.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.

Siemens, George & Baker, Ryan. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 10.1145/2330601.2330661.

Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940.

Stiggins, R. J., Frisbie, D. A., & Griswold, P. A. (1989). Inside high school grading practices: Building a research agenda. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(2), 5–14.

Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1990). Learning together: A history of coeducation in American public schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E. et al. (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

Welsh, M. E., D’Agostino, J. V., & Kaniskan, B. (2013). Grading as a reform effort: Do standards-based grades converge with test scores? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(2), 26–36.

“Wasserstein metric”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasserstein_metric